Recently, as we sat together in a group and asked us where the sites with all the education should still lead. We spoke of the children, young people and teachers, of reforms, carried out on their backs and on their sense and nonsense you might have to discuss again. And in this particular discussion should finally listen to the teachers who are to implement many of these on paper good-sounding reform and push their limits. Because many things are well meant, but only with much greater financial and staff time could be overcome. And because so much is well meant, but unfortunately was never thought through.
For example, one school, the children always used to be a. With the result that the recent youth have compulsory schooling at the age of just 15 years behind. If we consider now that we are today one year apply before graduation for an apprenticeship and must advance also still needs time to think about what you want for in life, then you come to the conclusion that a child of 13 or know at least 14 years ahead, what will one day because of him should be. So many young people are overwhelmed because of the decision comes too soon. If they do not now have the potential to Pass an entrance examination to secondary school, they are abandoned to the mercy of the very fragmented system of the bridge tenders. And then there is often completed in one year. Say: It trains young people earlier and then spits out the 15 in a world that they are not often grown. Not because they do not want but because they are too young.
For example: The whole concept of integration is good, but fails magnificently to the finances and the lack of staff. With the result that there are children and adolescents who received special classes in an optimal support, but are now kept in regular classes more or less, and do not benefit from the classes because he passes over their heads.
The fact that each and every (Mrs Zappadong) for an opinion and virtually every school and every they also announced does not make the whole thing easier. And now even the trade association Economiesuisse expressed his view to the elementary school, while an equal deficiency and wishlist delivered.
The focus should therefore be on the core competencies, which are: German and mathematics. I find a not so bad idea. Only one has in recent years - not least the wishes of the economy - other subjects included prominently in the curriculum. This should throw out again be difficult, or at the expense of subjects, in the eyes of the economy "not so important."
the whole education system open to claims of Economiesuisse just another construction site. To return to the initial discussion mentioned: I'm not sure if I still want to be in the current system teacher. And therefore brings for me it commented Antonio Cortesi in today Tagi for me at the end to the point: does
Ultimately, a school with good teachers. For virulent on teacher shortages, there are of Economiesuisse but no recipes. How about if the economy would be used for higher wages and better conditions of employment?
0 comments:
Post a Comment